2015.03.02_Sustainable Development_660

Sustainable development of the European port-city interface

2 februari 2015

3 minuten

Onderzoek In the past, areas at the geographical boundary of ports and their cities have generally been subject to dereliction and subsequent urban redevelopment. Old port areas are interesting for urban re-use due to their location on the waterfront and their close proximity to the inner city. Moreover, the public attitude towards waterfront zones has changed significantly since the 1960’s, and has created a high civic – and thus commercial – interest in waterfront locations inside the urban realm. Today, the pressure for the development of alternative uses in areas that are obsolete for or underutilized by their original functions is mounting, particularly in parts of the port (still) surrounded by the city. In fact, the great amount of attention for waterfront redevelopment projects around the globe have triggered a ‘logic’ which features an unstoppable and ongoing port decline or migration, automatically resulting in urban development opportunities. In major seaport-cities, however, this modus seems about to be put seriously to the test. What about harbour zones inside cities of which the port is still a growing and valuable asset? What will happen in still functioning port areas adjacent to the inner cities where ancient harbours have already become tourist attractions? Are these port areas, simply, up for urban redevelopment next? And if so, how does this process relate to the development of the port, its city, and the port-city interface? These questions are the motives behind this paper.

The main argument in this paper is that the development of the contemporary major seaport-city interface is different than it was some 20 years ago, and that this has implications for the way it is to be approached and handled by the actors involved. A major seaports’ evolution has become subject to a much more elusive set of factors, and its development process is currently being evaluated and re-conceptualized in practice as well as in theory. The logic in the urban re-use of port territory has thus, at least in leading European port-cities, come under question in policy-making and implementation processes. Illustrated by the case of Rotterdam and Hamburg, the argument in this paper will lead to an alternative interpretation of the contemporary port-city interface, emphasizing (the need for) relationships and coalitions between critical actors rather than the ongoing separations and divisions apparent between them. This interpretation is based on the literature about port-city development, and empirical observations of port-city interface development initiatives in Rotterdam and Hamburg.

The structure of this paper is as follows. First, an exploration of the literature on maritime port development will give a clear view on the factors shaping a major seaports’ evolution, particularly in continental Europe. Second, the relationship between these ports and their cities will be elaborated upon, and the emergence of the waterfront redevelopment phenomenon will be placed in the ambiguous context of the evolving major seaport-city interface. Third, the theoretical assumptions taken from port-city literature will be reflected upon by descriptions of the cases of Rotterdam and Hamburg, and the development initiatives emerging in their port-city interface. The results of these reflections will reveal the differences between past and present development initiatives in the port-city interface, and the need for a different planning approach in order to reach sustainable results.


Cover: ‘2015.03.02_Sustainable Development_660’


tom daamen2

Door Tom Daamen

Directeur SKG, Associate Professor Urban Development Management TU Delft


Meest recent

Winterse luchtfoto van de Zaan en de nieuwe Zaanbrug bij Wormerveer door Aerovista Luchtfotografie (bron: shutterstock)

Hoe je als woningcorporatie de opgaven en kansen effectief koppelt

Veel woningcorporaties zien woningen bouwen en verhuren al lang niet meer als enige taak; allerlei maatschappelijke opgaven vragen én hebben hun aandacht. De Zaanse corporatie Parteon zoekt de oplossingen in samenhang.

Onderzoek

17 september 2025

Luchtfoto van station Zwolle gezien vanuit het centrum door Remke Luitjes (bron: shutterstock)

Rijkssturingskompas legt basis voor nationale betrokkenheid bij grote gebiedsontwikkelingen

Het Rijk maakt aanstalten om zich weer in te zetten voor concrete gebiedsontwikkelingen. Het Rijkssturingskompas, ontwikkeld door de Stichting Kennis Gebiedsontwikkeling, moet helpen in die ambitie.

Onderzoek

16 september 2025

Ellen van Bueren Column Cover door Esther Dijkstra (bron: Esther Dijkstra)

Bestaande buurten komen er bekaaid af deze verkiezingen

Op Prinsjesdag komt columnist Ellen van Bueren met haar eigen statement, ook richting de aanstaande verkiezingen: kijk juist naar de bestaande buurten en wijken in Nederland. En verbeter daar de leefkwaliteit met groen en voorzieningen.

Opinie

16 september 2025

Uw gastbijdrage op GO.nu: Over gastbijdragen

Uw gastbijdrage op GO.nu

Wij staan open voor bijdragen uit wetenschap en praktijk. Wij moedigen auteurs aan hun kennis en ervaring te delen.

Over gastbijdragen
Uw project toevoegen: Ga naar de GO-Projectenkaart

Uw project toevoegen

Wilt u graag een gebiedsontwikkeling toevoegen aan de GO-projectenkaart? Vul dan via onderstaande link het formulier in.

Ga naar de GO-Projectenkaart
Uw organisatie bij de SKG: Ga naar de SKG-website

Uw organisatie bij de SKG

Uw organisatie aansluiten op het netwerk van de Stichting Kennis Gebiedsontwikkeling? Neem dan contact op.

Ga naar de SKG-website
Uw bijeenkomst in de agenda: Neem contact op

Uw bijeenkomst in de agenda

U kunt uw gebiedsontwikkeling-gerelateerde evenement aankondigen via onze agenda door contact op te nemen met de redactie.

Neem contact op